Abstract
This research study explored the role and relevance of income from on and off-farm activities in the income of the rural population. It is also analyzed the factors influencing the income formation of family heads in rural areas by TOBIT regression. An online survey conducted and 138 respondents` answers are analyzed. The results point to an interesting trend. In rural areas of the Republic of Uzbekistan, if a family head being busy in an off-farm activity, his or her average monthly income increases by 640.1 thousand sums. The educated family head, male heads of the household, living near to urban places, and good transport infrastructure raises the average monthly income by 1216.4 thousand, 546.6 thousand, 170.9 thousand, and 335.4 thousand sums respectively. However, 3 years of kids in a family minimizes the income by 433.2 thousand sums. In conclusion, the ways are recommended to improve the rural wellbeing, minimize poverty, and identifying its germination point of region or mahalla.
References
Idowu A.O., Banwo A., Akerele E.O. Non-farm activities and poverty among rural farm households in Yewa Division of Ogun State //Journal of Social Sciences. – 2011. – Т. 26. – №. 3. – С. 217-224.
Haggblade S., Hazell P., Reardon T. The rural non-farm economy: Prospects for growth and poverty reduction //World development. – 2010. – Т. 38. – №. 10. – С. 1429-1441.
Reardon T., Berdegué J., Escobar G. Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Latin America: overview and policy implications //World development. – 2001. – Т. 29. – №. 3. – С. 395-409.
Al-Amin A. K. M. A., Hossain M.J. Impact of non-farm income on welfare in rural Bangladesh: Multilevel mixed-effects regression approach //World Development Perspectives. – 2019. – Т. 13. – С. 95-102.
Mat S.H. C., Jalil A. Z. A., Harun M. Does non-farm income improve the poverty and income inequality among agricultural household in rural Kedah? //Procedia Economics and Finance. – 2012. – Т. 1. – С. 269-275.
Hossain M.J., Al-Amin A. K. M. A. Non-farm income and consumption expenditures in rural Bangladesh: empirical evidence from multilevel regression modelling //Journal of Quantitative Economics. – 2019. – Т. 17. – №. 2. – С. 377-396.
Hasanov Sh., Sanaev G. Non-farm employment trends and policy in rural areas of Samarkand region (Uzbekistan). – Discussion Paper, 2018. – №. 176.
Adewunmi O. Idowu*, Adesimi Banwo and Ezekiel O. Akerele. Non-farm Activities and Poverty among Rural Farm Households. Soc. Sci., 26(3): 217-224 (2011)
Haggblade S., Hazell P., Reardon T. The rural non-farm economy: Prospects for growth and poverty reduction //World development. – 2010. – Т. 38. – №. 10. – С. 1429-1441.
Ellis F. The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries //Journal of agricultural economics. – 2000. – Т. 51. – №. 2. – С. 289-302.
Barrett C. B., Reardon T., Webb P. Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications //Food policy. – 2001. – Т. 26. – №. 4. – С. 315-331.
Independent Evaluation Group. Growing the Rural Nonfarm Economy to Alleviate Poverty: An Evaluation of the Contribution of the World Bank Group. – 2016.
Nagler P., Naudé W., Naude W. Non-farm enterprises in rural Africa: New empirical evidence //World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. – 2014. – №. 7066.
http://www.fao.org/3/u8719e/u8719e04.htm - IV. Development of non-farm rural activities.
Anderson D., Leiserson M. W. Rural nonfarm employment in developing countries //Economic development and cultural change. – 1980. – Т. 28. – №. 2. – С. 227-248.
Ike P. C. et al. Determinants of participation in non-farm economic activities in South East Nigeria: a tobit analysis approach //Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. – 2015. – Т. 5. – №. 2. – С. 102-108.
Cai L. A. Analyzing household food expenditure patterns on trips and vacations: a Tobit model //Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. – 1998. – Т. 22. – №. 4. – С. 338-358.
Li G. et al. Regional Differences of Manufacturing Green Development Efficiency Considering Undesirable Outputs in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Super-SBM and WSR System Methodology //Frontiers in Environmental Science. – 2020. –Т. 8. –С. 299.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Иқтисодиёт ва таълим