SCIENTIFIC CATEGORY AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ESSENCE OF “QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION”
PDF (O'zbekcha)

Keywords

higher education
quality of education
quality assessment
systematic approach
higher education institution

How to Cite

Vakhabov А., & Khujakhanov М. (2023). SCIENTIFIC CATEGORY AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ESSENCE OF “QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION”. Economics and Education, 24(2), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.55439/ECED/vol24_iss2/a53

Abstract

In the article, the studies revealing the essence of the quality of higher education are divided into groups and modern approaches are generalized. The author's approach to the socio-economic interpretation of the quality of higher education is formulated. Hierarchical levels are determined on the basis of tasks that meet the quality of higher education. Scientific conclusions and practical recommendations aimed at ensuring the quality of higher education and the implementation of measures in a comprehensive description have been developed.

https://doi.org/10.55439/ECED/vol24_iss2/a53
PDF (O'zbekcha)

References

Ўзбекистон Республикаси Президентининг 2019 йил 8 октябрдаги “Ўзбекистон Республикаси олий таълим тизимини 2030 йилгача ривожлантириш концепциясини тасдиқлаш тўғрисида”ги ПФ-5847-сонли Фармони. https://lex.uz/docs/4545884

Green D. To Rank or To Be Ranked? - London: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, 1994. – р. 120.

Vlasceanu L., Grunberg L., Pаrlea D. Quality Assurance and the Development of Course: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions. - Bucharest: UNESCO, 2004. – p. 178.

Campbell C., Rozsnyai C. Benchmarking for Higher Education Programmes. – Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES, 2002. – p. 223.

Jackson N., Lund H. Benchmarking for Higher Education. - Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press, 2000. – p. 33.

Cheng Y.C., Tam W.M. Multi-models of Quality in Education. Quality Assurance in Education// Science and Education, 1997. – Oslo: University of Oslo. – pp. 22-34.

Левшина В.В. Развитие методологии создания системы менеджмента в качества вуза. // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. – М., 2003. № 2. – С. 7.

Геворкян Е.Н., Матова Г.Н. Болонский процесс и сотрудничество в области обеспечения качества образования: опыт Российской Федерации. // Вопросы образования. – М.: № 4, 2004. – С. 150-165.

Каримов А.А., Перегудов Л.В. Основы системы мониторинга и управления качеством высшего образования. – Тошкент: Молия, 2003. – С. 46.; Саидов М. Олий таълим менежменти ва иқтисодиёти. – Т.: Молия, 2002. 51-б.

Миркурбанов Н., Аношкина В., Данилова Е. Высшее образование в Узбекистане: состояние и рекомендации. // Аналитическая записка. – Тошкент: № 1 (12), 2009. 24-28-б.

Рахмонов Н.Р. Минтақавий ижтимоий-иқтисодий ривожланиш асосида олий таълим тизимида кадрлар тайёрлаш сифатини ошириш: Иқтисодиёт фан. док. дис. ... автореф. – Тошкент: ЎзМУ, 2019. – 16 б.

Bauer, M. Changing Quality Assessment in Sweden (Westerheijden et al. Changing Context of Quality Assessment). – Utrecht: Utrecht University, 1994. – pp. 15-30.

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. – Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2007. – p. 12.

Всемирная Декларация о высшем образовании для XXI века: подходы и практические меры. // Ахборот технологиялари ва масофавий ўқитиш маркази ахборотномаси. – Тошкент. № 6, 2002.– 22 б.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Economics and education